Author Topic: NC Election Board, One Stop Ineligible Voters Who Participated in 2016 General Election?  (Read 31044 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

citizensscience

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +0/-0



North Carolina Citizens cannot tolerate narrow Special Interest to intimidate, persuade and suppress 93,000 Early Votes!
 
Please reach across party lines tonight and share with ALL Citizens of NC and together we will Fight4Pat and stand firm for the integrity of Voting "Law and Order"!

It's been widely reported the alleged Election Tampering of Durham County threaten our founding democracy irregardless of party affiliation... 

Will you stand with our Governor and "Restore" Law and Order to the Voters of our great state...
« Last Edit: January 19, 2017, 08:58:30 PM by citizensscience »
Citizens Science

citizensscience

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +0/-0
With "Electronic Poll Books" cited as the driver for the Durham County voting issue, lets look at "Electronic Poll Books" their very intent / purpose...










Many question arise on pattern & specific location of alleged Electronic Poll Book  issues and the correlation of unconnected / un-bridged hardware to determine if the reported "Glitch" was Manufactured or Technical in nature...





Additionally media reports seem to support a well informed individual could simple dispute the "Administrative Record" of an "Electronic Poll Book"... This should they "Fail" the simple voter verification process that does NOT include photo identification.

In the most interesting twist, NC Voter ID "Plaintiffs" state Voter ID is a "Solution" to a problem that does not exist...   Does that statement apply to what they identify as "Glitches"?

Here is the Plaintiffs, Electronic Poll Books solution... Yes the one they did not want... Photo I.D.







With a timeline that resembles a well orchestrated plan, the below Tweet appears to have been sent to "Incite" Media Buy-in from ABC News...

Current reports indicate the Tweet and its content have since been deleted...







To summarize "Electronic Poll Books" are a generic form of the most antiquated fraud friendly form of Voter ID less the "Photo"...

Many remain perplexed why the Plaintiffs would make such a fuss about having to resort to an even further antiquated & unsecure method of voting with far less vetting? 

What if the alleged "Glitch" was in reality later determined to be individuals purposely sent to polling locations with the sole intent to dispute the Administrative Record of the nearly new software secured by the Durham County Board of Elections??

Then as the plan may have gone, alert one of  the well dispatched Plaintiffs Lawyers to scurry into court with a "Pre-Prepared" Compliant in an effort to allow polling to remain open across every polling location in Durham County?

Suppose the plaintiffs were so busy manufacturing distractions for the Durham Election Board it created an environment of chaos allowing what could prove to be a monumental heist of fraudulent voting while others were purposely preoccupied and looking the other way?

Please share this link as we continue to post much more data...
Citizens Science

lynn

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
  • Karma: +2/-0
And then there are some voters that went to the poll to find their vote had all ready been cast. A friend of mine was told he had all ready voted but he didn't cast the vote. Maybe SBI will sort it out.

citizensscience

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +0/-0
If an early Citizen Audit is any indication NC’s Dead Voters may prove to be the fraud Cooper failed to enforce while serving North Carolina Citizens as its Attorney General…

A citizens audit illustrates 3% of voters are dead, in some cases dying years ago…  Well past the 90day “Dead Voter” Threshold…

This damming information...  May serve to bring additional republican races into question and flipping the outcome in favor of  "Legal Voters"... and those candidates whom support common sense voter laws.

Continue to follow as we dig deeper into the #RiggedSystem





Each link below is an obituary that matches for First / Middle / Last name as well as County / City for someone who has done early voting. There are 9 records out of 300 early voters who have obituaries using a single 3rd party database for obituaries mapped to the Board of Elections database.

That is 3% of early voters who have exact match obituaries.

 
FOUND: WALTER GRAHAM from FAYETTEVILLE CUMBERLAND was found to have Obituary Links.
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=WALTER&gsln=GRAHAM&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=945587&db=NCdeathCerts&indiv=1&ml_rpos=1
 
 
FOUND: SAM JONES from FAYETTEVILLE CUMBERLAND was found to have Obituary Links.
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=SAM&gsln=JONES&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=1651447&db=NCdeathCerts&indiv=1&ml_rpos=1
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=SAM&gsln=JONES&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=1885184&db=NCdeathCerts&indiv=1&ml_rpos=2
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=SAM&gsln=JONES&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=6348851&recoff=9+10+42&db=NCdeaths&indiv=1&ml_rpos=3
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=SAM&gsln=JONES&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=913523&db=FS1NorthCarolinaDeaths&indiv=1&ml_rpos=4
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=SAM&gsln=JONES&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=56851844&db=FindAGraveUS&indiv=1&ml_rpos=5
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=SAM&gsln=JONES&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=6348890&recoff=9+11+43&db=NCdeaths&indiv=1&ml_rpos=6
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=SAM&gsln=JONES&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=6651289&recoff=9+11+44&db=NCdeaths&indiv=1&ml_rpos=7
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=SAM&gsln=JONES&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=30720722&db=FindAGraveUS&indiv=1&ml_rpos=8
 
 
FOUND: MILDRED WILLIAMS from FAYETTEVILLE CUMBERLAND was found to have Obituary Links.
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=MILDRED&gsln=WILLIAMS&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=1608574&db=NCdeathCerts&indiv=1&ml_rpos=1
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=MILDRED&gsln=WILLIAMS&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=79225459&recoff=10+11&db=ssdi&indiv=1&ml_rpos=2
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=MILDRED&gsln=WILLIAMS&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=12988528&recoff=9+11&db=NCdeaths&indiv=1&ml_rpos=3
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=MILDRED&gsln=WILLIAMS&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=23431075&db=StructuredCrawledSites-51&indiv=1&ml_rpos=4
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=MILDRED&gsln=WILLIAMS&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=18500124&db=FindAGraveUS&indiv=1&ml_rpos=5
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=MILDRED&gsln=WILLIAMS&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=114908496&db=FindAGraveUS&indiv=1&ml_rpos=6
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=MILDRED&gsln=WILLIAMS&msdpn__ftp=FAYETTEVILLE%2c+CUMBERLAND%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=5758424&db=FindAGraveUS&indiv=1&ml_rpos=7
 
 
FOUND: CLARA ELLIS from WINSTON SALEM FORSYTH was found to have Obituary Links.
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=CLARA&gsln=ELLIS&msdpn__ftp=WINSTON+SALEM%2c+FORSYTH%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=2396081&recoff=5+6&db=MADeathRecIndex&indiv=1&ml_rpos=1
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=CLARA&gsln=ELLIS&msdpn__ftp=WINSTON+SALEM%2c+FORSYTH%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=71661267&recoff=12+13&db=ssdi&indiv=1&ml_rpos=2
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=CLARA&gsln=ELLIS&msdpn__ftp=WINSTON+SALEM%2c+FORSYTH%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=17705090&recoff=9+10&db=ssdi&indiv=1&ml_rpos=3
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=CLARA&gsln=ELLIS&msdpn__ftp=WINSTON+SALEM%2c+FORSYTH%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=39235925&db=FindAGraveUS&indiv=1&ml_rpos=4
 
 
FOUND: MARGARET HUNT from OXFORD GRANVILLE was found to have Obituary Links.
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=MARGARET&gsln=HUNT&msdpn__ftp=OXFORD%2c+GRANVILLE%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=6560955&recoff=9+10+41&db=NCdeaths&indiv=1&ml_rpos=1
 
 
FOUND: MAGGIE BAKER from SCOTLAND NECK HALIFAX was found to have Obituary Links.
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=MAGGIE&gsln=BAKER&msdpn__ftp=SCOTLAND+NECK%2c+HALIFAX%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=1896352&db=NCdeathCerts&indiv=1&ml_rpos=1
 
 
FOUND: WILLIAM F MCKINSEY from SCOTLAND NECK HALIFAX was found to have Obituary Links.
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=WILLIAM+F&gsln=MCKINSEY&msdpn__ftp=SCOTLAND+NECK%2c+HALIFAX%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=51877497&db=FindAGraveUS&indiv=1&ml_rpos=1
 
 
FOUND: ZOLLIE RICHARDSON from HOLLISTER HALIFAX was found to have Obituary Links.
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=ZOLLIE&gsln=RICHARDSON&msdpn__ftp=HOLLISTER%2c+HALIFAX%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=429275&db=NCdeathCerts&indiv=1&ml_rpos=1
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=ZOLLIE&gsln=RICHARDSON&msdpn__ftp=HOLLISTER%2c+HALIFAX%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=51943639&recoff=11+12&db=ssdi&indiv=1&ml_rpos=2
 
 
FOUND: CHERRY H MILLER from CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG was found to have Obituary Links.
/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=CHERRY+H&gsln=MILLER&msdpn__ftp=CHARLOTTE%2c+MECKLENBURG%2c+North+Carolina%2c+USA&gsfn_x=XO&gsln_x=XO&msdpn__ftp_x=XO&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=121228951&db=FindAGraveUS&indiv=1&ml_rpos=1
« Last Edit: November 10, 2016, 06:29:44 PM by citizensscience »
Citizens Science

citizensscience

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +0/-0
North Carolina Voters are "Asking"...  Why did Durham County "Suppress" 93,000 "Early" Votes while under SBI Investigation?

Raleigh News and Observer previously reported charges could be forthcoming...


Citizens Science

citizensscience

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +0/-0
Durham County "Suppresses" 93,000 Early Votes until nearly midnight...





What is the "Ensuing" Intent of allegedly "Suppressing" Early Voting data that has been in the care, custody and control of Durham County Election Board for hours?

This paints a false narrative by placing Gov. McCrory up with a two point lead with over 83% precincts reporting. 

Next, note the timeline... This was at 4:36pm approximately the same time pressure was being applied by the plaintiffs to extend voting hours...by two...




« Last Edit: November 10, 2016, 12:26:46 AM by citizensscience »
Citizens Science

citizensscience

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +0/-0
Why the inflammatory fear mongering from some demanding the Durham Countywide polls remain needlessly open for an additional two hours?

At 1 pm Rev. Barber tweets - it's not the polls that close its the "Lines" that close...

So... Why the false narrative in an effort to keep polling in all of Durham's Precincts open for an additional 2 hours?






Via SSTNews


« Last Edit: November 09, 2016, 09:39:30 PM by citizensscience »
Citizens Science

citizensscience

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +0/-0



SBI Investigating Durham County “Ballots” -

Many North Carolina voters awoke early Wednesday morning after what will be remembered as one of the most historic elections in modern American history.  Voters were stunned to learn of just how close the race between Governor Pat McCrory and his opponent acting Attorney General Roy Coopers race ended, as Governor Pat McCrory was reported ahead most of election night.

As of 11/9 1:00 PM EST the Voting Information Project (VIP) a partnership between The Pew Charitable Trust, Google and the states exist to ensure that voters have the official (voter) information reported Roy Cooper holding a 4772 vote lead over incumbent Pat McCrory.

Facts indicate, Durham County Board of Elections withheld early voting results of some 93,000 ballots until just before midnight.  Why is this interesting? Because the vote count total is 149,000 meaning Durham and Orange Counties early voters accounted for an astonishing 62.4% of the total vote.

Governor Pat McCrory garnered merely 30,000 out of 149,000 total votes for split of 4 to 1 favoring his Democratic challenger.  Citizens are encouraged to canvas North Carolina’s other 98 Counties electronic voting totals and attempt to find any other counties with such disparity as reported by both Durham and Orange counties. 

Evidence seems to suggest:

- This was a carefully crafted plan allowing special interest to use an early lead by Governor Pat McCrory to rally fear among Durham and Orange Counties democratic voters in an effort to scurry bodies to the polls during the requested "Extended” voting times. 

- What is most glowing seems to be obvious with early votes making up 62.4% of the total votes, an unprecedented ratio and turnout.

- Election results indicate after the late inclusion of 93,000 early votes Gov. McCrory race was disproportionately affected vs other republican candidates.

This raises questions about possible coordination among the plaintiffs and others with regard to suppressing early vote data and the true authenticity of early votes.





What occurs next resembles step 2 of a seemingly well crafted ploy…  Petition the North Carolina Courts to order the Durham Countywide polls to remain open, however Judge Don Stephens rejected the ploy to keep all polling places in heavily-Democratic Durham County open for 90 additional minutes.  Judge Stephens saying “the state law allowing anyone in line to vote when the polls close is enough protection.” 



Via Electionland


Ultimately the Durham County Board of Elections voted to extend voting by two hours, however the NC State Board of Elections overruled, voting 3-2 on Tuesday to keep two Durham precincts open for an hour and six additional voting precincts open for 30 minutes.



Via SRNNews


Couple the withholding of 93K early votes until nearly midnight, reports of the NAACP leadership being within such close proximity to ground zero (Durham), deleted tweets and failed web-links it leaves many with more questions than answers.

Especially with the Durham Board of Elections currently under SBI Investigation for possible tampering with previous election results, it sent Twitter into a flury...



Via Indyweek


Via Twitter


Developing Story…
« Last Edit: November 09, 2016, 08:52:28 PM by citizensscience »
Citizens Science